Change is good!

I’ve thought about it long and hard. I’ve read some of the, how do I put it, colorful thoughts from the community open forums. Frankly, I think the viewpoints are interesting, let alone entertaining, especially as they relate to the old versus the new.  In reality the commenters are a small group of individuals. There is nothing wrong with a little change to stir things up. The real fact of the matter is that if more people within the community voted on such topics, the message boards would be moot, but you can only work with what you got.

My accepting the notion to run for the Allen ISD School Board stemmed from my own personal viewpoint. I saw a school board liberally accepting courses of action that I disagreed with, such as the prioritization of what is really needed for the district and the frivolously spending of our tax dollars. The excitement of the stadium, and the push to get the TRE passed, may have blinded a few and confused the weak. Being that the Trustees come from all walks of life, and all have deep-rooted ideas how the school board should conduct business, it is inherent that the process ran into conflict. Those that do not have strong beliefs do not run for office.

As a “very conservative” board member I have taken my share of the arrows, which really don’t bother me. If I can stir things up, and get the board to make some changes, then so be it. I do believe the school district is better off today because of the turmoil. Although we have a ways to go, that turmoil brought us better accountability, more direct transparency, less secrecy, and a new Superintendent, in essence a clean slate. You can count on the notion that we will face some more tough hurdles in the future, reduction in taxes, security, Lowery bonds, the Stadium resolution and the discussion about a second High School. I feel we will be better prepared and inclusive of the community with more open dialogue.   

It has been stated that our school systems are heavily leaning left. I can in fact state that there is some truth to that. As it stands today, although some will state otherwise, my observations tell me that the majority of the board do lean left. Not that there is anything wrong with that, unless you are a conservative like me, the fact of the matter is that our district lost sight when it came to taxpayer spending. We capped out on the tax rate and the entire Nation knows about it. Thanks to our new Superintendent, we have started to reverse that trend. Combine the tax issue with the lack of transparency on issues, only fostered conspiracy theories that fragmented the community – the taxpayers. Plus, it doesn’t help that there is an “Eastside versus Westside” when it comes to the small amount of voters who post about everything.

We have to remember, we had only 2100 show up to vote in the last election, that’s 2% of the population of Allen, so naturally the message boards will create some new “social intellects” on the small local scene. At the end of the day, we the 2% of the population, are starting to believe that we are bigger, and more important, than we really are. What is really scary is that 2% actually controls the election process in selecting a board that has the biggest impact on our taxes. How asinine is that?

As one board member said the other night, “it’s the perception to the community that matters.” I wholeheartedly agree. What I see is a shift in the Boards mindset, which is shifting to the right, meaning more focus on less tax. Whenever a shift like this happens the people being shifted get upset, especially anyone who was part of the past, or has a more liberal mindset, which, impacts a school system that is dominated by the liberal mindset. We cannot deny the fact that the “perception” that the board has indeed been frivolous, to which, has become evident to everyone in the community – hell the Nation. Doesn’t matter if the Board really has been, or not, the perception still exists.

As a conservative Board Member I’m there to watch over the large impact financial items that the Superintendent presents to us. I leave the knowledge of how the school district gets administered to the Administrator, after all that’s why we pay him the big bucks. My observations also show me that those that lean left want to get into the weeds and help administer the district directly.

The liberal mindset (nothing wrong with that) is based on a more social accepting solution to pretty much everything, nothing is better suited for such a mindset than our education system, after all, focusing on the education of our children is a social issue. The conservative mindset is more focused on the fiscal viability and the analytical thought process and how it governs the body in whole. Thus, from my viewpoint (as a conservative) the overall liberal mindset of the board, and a dominating Superintendent, may have been the root cause for the Board’s disconnect with the community in the past, thus its taxpaying base. This is nobody’s fault; this is just how the process works. Unfortunately, those that were present during the course of events will take the heat for continuing to push the district in that mindset, which, if you looked at it from a higher point of view you will see such corrective action is required in order to change course. 

Those with a liberal mindset tend to be too far into the weeds, thus, lose focus of the big picture. Case in point: the Stadium, had there been the equitable practice in place to conduct a sizable procurement process, measurable to the size of the project the district was undertaking, we would not be in the situation we are today. Nothing is 100% though, and it’s always easier to drive from the back seat. From what I can ascertain the Board was too close to what was going on, plus, the lack of fiscal controls and auditing procedures became open ground to contractor influence, which ultimately impacted the overall project as it pertained to quality controls and oversight, thus my call for an investigation into any possible wrong doings during this timeframe. Which still hasn’t been done yet. When the petri dish is ripe, the mold will grow.  Regardless, we have what we have.

A conservative tends to stay away from the small issues and focus more on the larger ones. By doing so, a conservative is cast as an anti-social and anti-empathetic, thus, the liberal will think the conservative is not focused on the real issues of providing equal and fair treatment to all; what better place to be viewed as anti-empathetic than our academic system where “it is all about the kids” and has a dominating liberal mindset. Conflict is inevitable. This divide between mindsets is what the Board is going through, eventually it will sway back towards the center on its own, and thus change becomes the catalyst. When the mindset becomes stagnant, whether right or left, we lose sight. The reason the Board will always sway to the center is because everyone is focused on the same issue, “what is best for the kids”. By focusing on the kids we are all driving towards the same destination, thus the “Abilene Paradox” theory, it just takes time.

When a septic situation of competing issues arises, we tend to focus on the issues we feel most comfortable with, thus, left versus right, east versus west, this is where the Superintendent comes into play. By focusing on the issues head-on, and openly to the community, the Superintendent can massage the mindsets back towards a centrist approach, that’s how the game is played. There are those that believe that this is “bad” for the district, in fact, it is good for the district. We are clearing the underbrush on the issues and will be left with a forest that has less vulnerability when it comes to the big fires…. and there will be more big fires. At the end of the day, and no matter how much people will shift in their stance, the board has one employee – the Superintendent. We have entrusted a $150 Million dollar, taxpayer funded, company into the Superintendent’s hands. Time will tell, but from my personal standpoint, we have the right man at the helm.

Although there has been, and is, some discourse on the board, I believe it is a natural process, especially given the boards disconnect with the community; its perception of frivolous spending; and the inadequate priorities. What do you expect given the bonding we just went through, the bus barn selection, and now the stadium? I hope you weren’t expecting a smooth ride. The good thing about where we stand now, we have the community’s attention; we have a keen focus on integrity; we are seeing more transparency; we have the brought to light the deficiencies and have made adjustments; and have prioritized the Lowery Freshman Center. How long it will last is a whole other topic, after all, Boards change all the time.

If you are looking for the perfect answer to how the school district should be run, well, I hate to break it to you, it won’t happen. No matter how perfect and educated you think you may be on any of the topics, it really doesn’t matter, because the board system is designed to balance itself with a counterintuitive thought process. The only time that balance is threatened is when Board members start to sing in unison on every topic, even more dangerous when the Superintendent is right there with them. No one on the board is perfect, and I believe discourse is good, just wait and see what heat I will take for starting my blog again. The fact of the matter is that I have more readers than we have voters during our ISD elections, if my blog helps get more people involved, then that is a price I am willing to pay. And for all those antagonists out there, as a citizen protected under the First Amendment, these are my own viewpoints. Dr. Hindt speaks for the ISD, not me, and the elected Board President speaks for the Board.  

Dr. Michael Myers

ANY DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF DR MYERS.